In The Washington Post, Jason Willick argues that all the talk of Twitter becoming a cesspool under Musk is overblown: “Musk’s views on the limits of liberal tolerance aren’t fully developed. How Musk could transform Twitter for the better Under Musk, then, “Twitter will be left to face the problems of an aggressively polarized and increasingly toxic political and cultural environment with little of the crucial hindsight of its past.” “Because Twitter is still an awful place - but one with a lot more tools, like setting who can see or reply to your tweets, that victims of harassment can employ - certain people seem to have forgotten that blatant, vile harassment used to go almost unchecked,” he writes. The tech journalist Charlie Warzel predicts that the platform could come to resemble Twitter around 2016, before the company tightened its content moderation policies.
Best twitter gay porn pages free#
Musk will command a gigantic megaphone and be free to plug his own investments, pooh-pooh sound health regulations and shout down critics.”įor many users - women and minorities in particular - Twitter may become an even more hostile environment. “Musk’s reasons for taking control of Twitter aren’t about free speech,” writes Greg Bensinger, a member of the Times editorial board.
“That gives him good reason to care about the company’s financial health, even if he says he doesn’t.” “Musk’s exposure is chunky even for a man of his net worth,” Liam Proud writes at Reuters. About one-quarter of his acquisition funding came from loans secured against Twitter Musk provided the rest - $33.5 billion - in a combination of cash and loans secured against his Tesla stock. “Donald Trump used Twitter to win the presidency, but Elon Musk used it to sustain the Tesla narrative and support the stock when the company was in danger of collapse.” Smith School of Business, told The Los Angeles Times. Musk has discussed plans to make the company’s algorithm an open-source model that would allow users to peek under the hood of their timelines, rather than “having tweets sort of be mysteriously promoted and demoted with no insight into what’s going on.”īy the numbers: Whatever Musk’s public statements, it bears noting that “no one has profited more from the existence of Twitter than Elon Musk,” as David Kirsch, a professor at the University of Maryland’s Robert H. Twitter used to present information chronologically since March, however, it has defaulted to an algorithm-based feed optimized for engagement. (Musk has not commented publicly on how he would handle Trump’s case, and Trump said this week he has no interest in rejoining.) At the same time, Musk has vowed to rid the platform of bots and spam.Ĭhanges to the algorithm. Musk’s pointed comments about free speech have raised questions about whether he would reinstate users who have been barred for violating Twitter’s policies - the most prominent offender being former President Donald Trump. New rules about who - or what - could use the platform. “He imagines a social network transformed, by him, into a paragon of expression without theoretical limits.” “Musk’s favorite idea is a Twitter that operates the way he uses Twitter: no holds barred,” The Times’s Shira Ovide wrote. A self-described “free speech absolutist,” Musk has frequently criticized Twitter’s content moderation policies for being too censorious. There are a few predictable ways Musk might seek to realize his vision, The Times’s Melina Delkic explains:
Best twitter gay porn pages for free#
His primary interest in the site, which he has called the internet’s “de facto town square,” stems from “its potential to be the platform for free speech around the globe,” as he wrote in a letter to Twitter’s board. If you take Musk at his word, profit wasn’t a motivating factor in his purchase. Twitter is one of the world’s most prominent and paradoxical social media companies: As the tech journalist Max Read writes, it’s “probably the most influential social platform on the planet - a concentrated network of elite figures in media, politics, technology, and entertainment, all of whom look toward the site as a guide to what is important in their fields.” But as a business, it’s also one of Silicon Valley’s most infamous underperformers, troubled for years by content moderation controversies and investor complaints that it doesn’t make enough money.Ĭan Musk fix what’s broken with Twitter, or will he make its problems worse? Here’s what people are saying. (It will take another three to six months for the deal to close, during which time it could still fall through.)
You can sign up here to receive it on Wednesdays.Īs with so much about the man, it was a joke until it wasn’t: On Monday, Elon Musk, the world’s richest person and the chief executive of Tesla, struck a deal to buy Twitter for $44 billion, a little less than one-sixth of his $270 billion net worth.
This article is part of the Debatable newsletter.